Thursday 28 July 2011

CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUNDS ENDANGERED: SOLUTIONS PROPOSED

CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUNDS ENDANGERED: SOLUTIONS PROPOSED

Presidential candidate Dr. Tony Tan recently spoke about “how close we were to a total collapse of the world financial system in 2008-2009”. (Straits Times 20 July 2011)

This contradicts Minister Lim Hng Kiang’s 2008 statement four days after Singapore guaranteed $700 billion deposits of various currencies. $150 billion reserves was set aside for this limitless guarantee. Minister Lim said “$150 billion backing is an amount that will be ample to meet any eventuality except the most remote.” If we were so close to a total collapse as Dr. Tan says, that means we were close to losing more than $150 billion reserves. Didn’t MAS think the fall of Lehman Brother was most remote too?

The U.S. Stock Market fell 89 percent during the Great Depression. Our reserves will be worth pennies on the dollar if the global economy had collapsed. However, depositors are still entitled to their $700 billion in cash at the click of the mouse. How is Singapore going to raise so much cash so fast? Such pressures will cause Singapore’s currency to fall and devalue our Central Provident Funds. Moreover, our liabilities for foreign currencies’ deposits will rise.

Why did the limitless guarantee cover foreign banks which had financial troubles in hundreds of billions of dollars? Why did it last till end of 2010? Even if a limitless guarantee is needed, it should cover only the Singaporean banks like DBS, OCBC and UOB. Moreover, shorter time frames should be used to enable regular reviews.

Looking forward, laws must be enacted to ensure that only a limited percentage of our total reserves can ever be used for bank guarantees. PERCENTAGE is the most important word here because value of reserves plunge when markets plummet like waterfalls.

Britain used anti-terrorism laws to freeze Iceland’s assets. Total bank deposits in Iceland was only a small fraction of the bank deposits in Singapore. If a “total collapse” had occurred, Singapore’s reserves may not be enough to cover the $700 billions deposits of various currencies. Singapore’ indebtedness may far exceed that of Iceland. Governments worldwide may also freeze Singapore’s assets.

To avoid foreign governments confusing our Central Provident Funds with our reserves, Singapore should progressively give Singaporeans freedom to take out their CPF money as and when they wish.

Singapore must not try to play the role of Bernanke with our Central Provident Funds. Bernanke may print unlimited quantities of money but our Central Provident Funds are limited.

writejt@gmail.com

http://singaporereserves.blogspot.com

Yours Sincerely,

Joseph Tan